Bet Big and Earn Little playing Craps
If you choose to use this approach you really want to have a very big amount of cash and remarkable fortitude to step away when you realize a small win. For the purposes of this essay, an example buy in of $2,000 is used.
The Horn Bet numbers are surely not seen as the "successful way to wager" and the horn bet itself has a house advantage of over 12 %.
All you are playing is $5 on the pass line and a single number from the horn. It does not matter whether it is a "craps" or "yo" as long as you wager it consistently. The Yo is more established with people using this scheme for obvious reasons.
Buy in for $2,000 when you sit down at the table but only put $5.00 on the passline and one dollar on either the two, three, 11, or twelve. If it wins, beautiful, if it loses press to two dollars. If it loses again, press to $4 and then to eight dollars, then to sixteen dollars and following that add a one dollar each subsequent wager. Every instance you lose, bet the last wager plus a further dollar.
Adopting this approach, if for instance after 15 rolls, the number you bet on (11) hasn’t been tosses, you likely should step away. However, this is what might happen.
On the 10th roll, you have a sum total of one hundred and twenty six dollars in the game and the YO finally hits, you amass three hundred and fifteen dollars with a take of one hundred and eighty nine dollars. Now is a great time to walk away as it is a lot more than what you joined the game with.
If the YO does not hit until the 20th toss, you will have a complete investment of $391 and seeing as current bet is at $31, you win $465 with your profit of $74.
As you can see, adopting this scheme with only a $1.00 "press," your gain becomes tinier the longer you bet on without succeeding. This is why you must go away once you have won or you have to bet a "full press" once more and then carry on with the one dollar increase with each roll.
Carefully go over the data before you try this so you are very accomplished at when this scheme becomes a non-winning affair rather than a winning one.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
